The "Philosopher"-Pastor
The "Philosopher"-Pastor
This little treatise is probably going to be a bit autobiographical--so, if you would rather not peruse it, here is your early "warning"(!) Just very recently, I have come to more-fully realize that I myself fit into this category of a "philosopher"-pastor. From the very outset, I wish to emphasize that the word "pastor" takes absolute precedence over the descriptor "philosopher."
. . . In my opinion, in many cases, the "philosopher"-pastor never intended to be a church minister of the gospel. Instead, he envisioned his life as one of quiet study and writing--with perhaps some teaching mixed-in. (Just how he was going to pull this off, is anyone's guess[!]) But, in time, God clearly calls these "philosopher"-pastors into the church's formal gospel ministry. When this call happens, they go.
In the history of the church, I would include the following men in the category of "philosopher"-pastors: Augustine, Anselm of Canterbury, John Calvin (with an asterisk*), and Jonathan Edwards. (Ambrose of Milan might also be slotted in.) None of these men--with the notable exception of Edwards (and perhaps Anselm)--were "planning" to be pastors in Christ's church. Still, all of them got called; and all of them accepted the call.
"Philosopher"-pastors are sort of "odd birds" in the church, and even among the college of the church's truly-called ministers (presbyters). They tend to be "different," a little out of the "mainstream." In practical terms, these pastors gravitate toward simplicity in the ministry, by emphasizing and focusing on the ordinary means of grace: the church's Sunday preaching of the gospel; the administration of the sacraments (of baptism and the Lord's Supper); and prayer. These "philosopher"-pastors sometimes, (not always), are not the greatest at fully-understanding or -appreciating--let alone practicing--some other important aspects of the ministry. These things may include formal modes of evangelism, formal modes of discipleship, church planting, (and even, to some extent) world missions. It is not that these blessings are not truly appreciated or practiced--it is just that the "philosopher"-pastor has a more difficult time incorporating these dynamics into his practical heart of ministry. All of these things are done (by any faithful minister)--but they are not always accomplished in the conventional ways.
I think "philosopher"-pastors have to take a "back seat" to their more "normal" or "conventional" pastoral colleagues. These (other) men are the ones, typically, who actually accomplish, by God's grace alone in Jesus, the things for which we all pray.
Still, to understand oneself is a good and a healthy thing; and even if it takes years (or decades) to finally realize who you are and why you operated (or operate) in the way you do--this is good and beneficial.
The church is both made up of (and needs) all types of people: men and women, boys and girls, who are all one body in Christ--and who yet are very divergent from one another in giftedness and inclination.
Is there still room for "philosopher"-pastors in Christ's church? I would say the answer is, "Yes." Still, let us be most-grateful for those "down to earth" faithful men who actually get the work of the ministry done(!)
"And I, when I came to you, brothers, did not come proclaiming to you the testimony of God with lofty speech or wisdom. For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified," (1 Cor. 2:1-2/ESV).
Rev. Mark J. Henninger
Treatise #98
13 May 2026
* Calvin was not a big fan of the incorporation of conventional philosophy into theological discussions. Still, he knew and understood it very well.
Comments
Post a Comment